✦ SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARE

ROG Swift PG27AQDM vs UltraGear OLED 27 vs Odyssey OLED G8: which is better?

ROG Swift PG27AQDM, UltraGear OLED 27 and Odyssey OLED G8 compared side by side across 12 specs and 10 scored categories — every winner highlighted, so the right pick is obvious.

3 PRODUCTS · 12 SPECS · 10 SCORED CATEGORIES · LIVE RE-RANKING

COMPARING

3 / 4

MONITORS

Add or remove products — every chart and spec row re-ranks live.

ASUS

ROG Swift PG27AQDM

$999

BEST FOR GAMING PERFORMANCE

← TOP PICK

UltraGear OLED 27

$799

BEST OVERALL

SAMSUNG

Odyssey OLED G8

$999

BEST SCREEN SIZE

Add product

1 AVAILABLE

⚡ COMPARZONE VERDICT

The UltraGear OLED 27 takes the overall win.

Highest composite at 9.1/10 — 0.1 ahead of the ROG Swift PG27AQDM. Dead heat on display. Scroll for the category-by-category breakdown.

View best price →

CATEGORY WINS · 10 SCOREDTIES SHOWN GREY

GAMI

IMAG

HDR

COLO

ERGO

VALU

DISP

PERF

CONN

DESI

ROG Swift PG27AQDM×5

UltraGear OLED 27×2

Odyssey OLED G8×2

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED MonitorBEST FOR GAMING PERFORMANCE

LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE)BEST OVERALL

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD)BEST SCREEN SIZE

01 · SCORE RADAR

Performance profile

CLICK A PRODUCT TO ISOLATE ITS SHAPE

LARGEST GAPGaming Performance — ROG Swift PG27AQDM leads by 9.5

TIGHTESTDisplay — dead heat between the top two

02 · CATEGORY BREAKDOWN

Category showdown

SWIFT PG27OLED 27OLED G8

Gaming PerformanceiROG Swift PG27AQDM · +9.5

SWIFT PG279.5

OLED 270.0

OLED G80.0

Image QualityiROG Swift PG27AQDM · +9.0

SWIFT PG279.0

OLED 270.0

OLED G80.0

HDRiROG Swift PG27AQDM · +8.5

SWIFT PG278.5

OLED 270.0

OLED G80.0

Color AccuracyiROG Swift PG27AQDM · +9.0

SWIFT PG279.0

OLED 270.0

OLED G80.0

ErgonomicsiROG Swift PG27AQDM · +8.5

SWIFT PG278.5

OLED 270.0

OLED G80.0

ValueiUltraGear OLED 27 · +0.2

SWIFT PG277.5

OLED 278.4

OLED G88.2

DisplayiTIED AT 9.5

SWIFT PG270.0

OLED 279.5

OLED G89.5

PerformanceiUltraGear OLED 27 · +0.2

SWIFT PG270.0

OLED 279.6

OLED G89.4

ConnectivityiOdyssey OLED G8 · +0.6

SWIFT PG270.0

OLED 277.8

OLED G88.4

DesigniOdyssey OLED G8 · +0.2

SWIFT PG270.0

OLED 278.8

OLED G89.0

03 · VALUE MAP

Price vs performance

TOP-LEFT IS THE SWEET SPOT

SCORE PER $100 · RANKED

01UltraGear OLED 271.14BEST DEAL

02ROG Swift PG27AQDM0.90

03Odyssey OLED G80.89

Map shows current starting prices · trends show tracked street prices. Check live deals before deciding.

04 · THE FULL SHEET

Full specifications

12 SPECS · ALL SHOWN

SPECS

ROG Swift PG27AQDM$9990W9.0

UltraGear OLED 27$7990W9.1

Odyssey OLED G8$9992W8.9

Portsi

1x DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0, 1x USB-B upstream, 2x USB 3.2 hub, 3.5mm audio

HDMI 2.1 x2, DP 1.4, USB hub

HDMI 2.1 x2, DP 1.4, USB-C

USB-C Power DeliveryWi

—

0 W

65 W← BEST

Stand Adjustmentsi

Height, tilt, and swivel adjustable (VESA 100x100)

Height / tilt / pivot

Height / tilt / swivel

Screen SizeINi

26.5 in

27 in

32 in← BEST +19%

Resolutioni

2560x1440

2560 x 1440 (QHD)

3840 x 2160 (4K)

Panel Typei

WOLED

OLED

QD-OLED

BrightnessNITSiSAME

1,000 nits

HDRiSAME

VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400

Color Gamuti

99% DCI-P3

98.5% DCI-P3

99% DCI-P3

Adaptive Synci

G-Sync Compatible / FreeSync Premium

G-Sync Compatible / FreeSync Premium Pro

Refresh RateHZiSAME

240 Hz

Response TimeMSiSAME

0.03 ms

ROW WINS

05 · WHICH ONE IS FOR YOU

Pick by persona

RE-RANKS LIVE AS YOU ADD OR REMOVE PRODUCTS

THE ALL-ROUNDER

Best overall

UltraGear OLED 27LG9.1

ALL GROUPSEQUAL WEIGHT

Best total score across weighted category factors.

RUNNER-UP · ROG Swift PG27AQDM (9.0)

FOR VALUE SEEKERS

Best bang for buck

UltraGear OLED 27LG9.1

SCORE ÷ PRICELIVE PRICES

Strongest score-to-price ratio from the available price data.

RUNNER-UP · ROG Swift PG27AQDM (0.9)

PRIORITY · GAMING PERFORMANCE

Best for gaming performance

ROG Swift PG27AQDMASUS9.5

GAMING PERFORMANCE WEIGHTEDCONF 91%

Best visible score in the gaming performance category group.

RUNNER-UP · UltraGear OLED 27 (0.0)

PRIORITY · IMAGE QUALITY

Best for image quality

ROG Swift PG27AQDMASUS9.0

IMAGE QUALITY WEIGHTEDCONF 86%

Best visible score in the image quality category group.

RUNNER-UP · UltraGear OLED 27 (0.0)

06 · BOTTOM LINE

Why pick each

STRENGTHS · AND ONE HONEST TRADE-OFF

#2ASUS0.0

ROG Swift PG27AQDM

“A flat 27-inch 1440p WOLED gaming monitor running at 240Hz with a custom heatsink, exceptional motion clarity, and a premium ROG build.”

Gaming Performance 9.5

Image Quality 9.0

Wins Refresh Rate

Wins Brightness

TRADE-OFFWOLED subpixel layout can fringe fine text

BEST FOR GAMING PERFORMANCEBest price →

#1LG0.0

UltraGear OLED 27

“A 240Hz 1440p OLED gaming monitor with near-instant response, perfect blacks, and stunning contrast.”

Performance 9.6

Display 9.5

TRADE-OFFModest full-screen brightness

BEST OVERALLBest price →

#3SAMSUNG0.0

Odyssey OLED G8

“A 32-inch 4K 240Hz QD-OLED that does it all: gaming speed, HDR brilliance, and a glare-free matte finish.”

Display 9.5

Performance 9.4

Wins Screen Size

Wins USB-C Power Delivery

TRADE-OFFPremium price

BEST SCREEN SIZEBest price →

Still deciding? The UltraGear OLED 27 is the safest pick.

COMPOSITE 9.1/10 · WINS 2 OF 10 CATEGORIES

Buy the winner →

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor vs LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD): which is best?

The LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) is our overall pick, scoring 9.1/10 against 9.0/10 for the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor — a 1% edge. Current starting prices span $799–$999. The score weighs category-specific monitors attributes, spec wins, price signals, and data confidence — not sponsorships.

LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) leads overall with a 9.1 total score.
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor wins 3 comparable specs with a 28% weighted win rate.
Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD) has the strongest high-impact advantage in Screen Size.
LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) has the best visible score-to-price balance based on available starting price.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor9.0/10

A flat 27-inch 1440p WOLED gaming monitor running at 240Hz with a custom heatsink, exceptional motion clarity, and a premium ROG build.

Pros

+ 240Hz OLED with 0.03ms response and superb motion clarity
+ Flat panel and standard 16:9 aspect ratio
+ Custom heatsink helps sustained brightness and longevity
+ 3-year warranty covers burn-in

Cons

− WOLED subpixel layout can fringe fine text
− Premium price versus comparable LCDs
− Modest full-screen SDR brightness like most OLEDs

Best for: Competitive gamers wanting maximum motion clarity · Buyers who prefer a flat 16:9 OLED over an ultrawide · Players mixing fast esports and cinematic titles

“The PG27AQDM is a benchmark 27-inch OLED gaming monitor. The 240Hz refresh combined with OLED response delivers some of the cleanest motion you can buy, and ASUS's cooling and 3-year burn-in warranty address the usual OLED concerns. It is expensive, and text…”

LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE)WINNER 9.1/10

A 240Hz 1440p OLED gaming monitor with near-instant response, perfect blacks, and stunning contrast.

Pros

+ 240Hz with 0.03ms response
+ Perfect OLED blacks and contrast
+ Vivid, accurate color
+ Sleek low-profile design

Cons

− Modest full-screen brightness
− OLED care needed (burn-in mitigation)
− 1440p, not 4K

Best for: Competitive and fast-paced gaming · Contrast-critical media · High-refresh enthusiasts

“One of the best 1440p gaming OLEDs: blistering speed, perfect blacks, and rich color. Full-screen brightness is modest and OLED care is required, as on all OLED panels.”

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD)8.9/10

A 32-inch 4K 240Hz QD-OLED that does it all: gaming speed, HDR brilliance, and a glare-free matte finish.

Pros

+ 4K 240Hz QD-OLED — speed and sharpness
+ Excellent HDR with perfect blacks
+ Glare-free matte coating
+ Slim design with smart-TV apps

Cons

− Premium price
− OLED burn-in care needed
− Single best for one use? It tries to do all

Best for: Gamers who also want 4K sharpness · HDR media and movies · One-monitor flagship setups

“A do-everything OLED flagship: 4K sharpness, 240Hz speed, and superb HDR, with a glare-free finish. It is expensive and, like all OLEDs, needs basic burn-in care.”

Frequently asked questions

Which is best: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor, LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) or Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD)?

By ComparZone's weighted scoring of category-specific monitors specs, the LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) scores highest overall (9.1/10, 0.1 points ahead of the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor). It is the better all-round pick, but the right choice depends on your priorities — the spec table above shows exactly where each one wins.

What are the main differences between these monitors?

The biggest measurable differences are Resolution, Screen Size, Panel Type. The grouped spec sheet above marks the winner of every comparable spec.

Can I compare other monitors on ComparZone?

Yes — ComparZone supports dynamic comparison pages for any 2 to 4 monitors from the same category, with verified specs, transparent scores, and live prices. See the related comparisons below or build your own from the category page.

More monitors comparisons

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor vs Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming Monitor ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor vs Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE)ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor vs Asus ProArt Display PA279CRV LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming Monitor LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE)LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs Asus ProArt Display PA279CRV Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD) vs Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming Monitor Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD) vs Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE)Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD) vs Asus ProArt Display PA279CRV All monitors →Best monitors 2026