✦ SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARE

UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C vs M27Q vs UltraGear OLED 27: which is better?

UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C, M27Q and UltraGear OLED 27 compared side by side across 12 specs and 9 scored categories — every winner highlighted, so the right pick is obvious.

3 PRODUCTS · 12 SPECS · 9 SCORED CATEGORIES · LIVE RE-RANKING

COMPARING

3 / 4

MONITORS

Add or remove products — every chart and spec row re-ranks live.

DELL

UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C

$899

WINS CONNECTIVITY

GIGABYTE

M27Q

$299

BEST VALUE

← TOP PICK

UltraGear OLED 27

$799

BEST OVERALL

Add product

1 AVAILABLE

⚡ COMPARZONE VERDICT

The UltraGear OLED 27 takes the overall win.

Highest composite at 9.1/10 — 0.3 ahead of the UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C. Tightest race: design, just 0.2 apart. Scroll for the category-by-category breakdown.

View best price →

CATEGORY WINS · 9 SCOREDTIES SHOWN GREY

DISP

PERF

CONN

DESI

VALU

GAMI

IMAG

COLO

ERGO

UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C×2

M27Q×5

UltraGear OLED 27×2

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE)WINS CONNECTIVITY

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming MonitorBEST VALUE

LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE)BEST OVERALL

01 · SCORE RADAR

Performance profile

CLICK A PRODUCT TO ISOLATE ITS SHAPE

LARGEST GAPGaming Performance — M27Q leads by 8.5

TIGHTESTDesign — only 0.2 between the top two

02 · CATEGORY BREAKDOWN

Category showdown

USB CM27QOLED 27

DisplayiUltraGear OLED 27 · +0.4

USB C9.1

M27Q0.0

OLED 279.5

PerformanceiUltraGear OLED 27 · +1.6

USB C8.0

M27Q0.0

OLED 279.6

ConnectivityiUltraSharp 32 4K USB-C · +1.0

USB C9.5

M27Q8.5

OLED 277.8

DesigniUltraSharp 32 4K USB-C · +0.2

USB C9.0

M27Q0.0

OLED 278.8

ValueiM27Q · +1.1

USB C8.4

M27Q9.5

OLED 278.4

Gaming PerformanceiM27Q · +8.5

USB C0.0

M27Q8.5

OLED 270.0

Image QualityiM27Q · +8.0

USB C0.0

M27Q8.0

OLED 270.0

Color AccuracyiM27Q · +8.0

USB C0.0

M27Q8.0

OLED 270.0

ErgonomicsiM27Q · +6.0

USB C0.0

M27Q6.0

OLED 270.0

03 · VALUE MAP

Price vs performance

TOP-LEFT IS THE SWEET SPOT

SCORE PER $100 · RANKED

01M27Q2.78BEST DEAL

02UltraGear OLED 271.14

03UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C0.98

Map shows current starting prices · trends show tracked street prices. Check live deals before deciding.

04 · THE FULL SHEET

Full specifications

12 SPECS · ALL SHOWN

SPECS

UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C$8992W8.8

M27Q$2990W8.3

UltraGear OLED 27$7993W9.1

Portsi

TB4/USB-C 140W, DP, HDMI, RJ45, USB hub

2x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x USB-C (DP Alt Mode), 2x USB 3.0, 3.5mm audio

HDMI 2.1 x2, DP 1.4, USB hub

USB-C Power DeliveryWi

140 W← BEST +1300%

10 W

0 W

Stand Adjustmentsi

Height / tilt / swivel / pivot

Tilt-only (VESA 100x100)

Height / tilt / pivot

Screen SizeINi

32 in← BEST +19%

27 in

Resolutioni

3840 x 2160 (4K)

2560x1440

2560 x 1440 (QHD)

Panel Typei

IPS Black

IPS

OLED

BrightnessNITSi

450 nits

350 nits

1,000 nits← BEST +122%

HDRi

VESA DisplayHDR 600

VESA DisplayHDR 400

VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400

Color Gamuti

99% sRGB / 98% DCI-P3

92% DCI-P3

98.5% DCI-P3

Adaptive Synci

Adaptive Sync

FreeSync Premium / G-Sync Compatible

G-Sync Compatible / FreeSync Premium

Refresh RateHZi

120 Hz

170 Hz

240 Hz← BEST +41%

Response TimeMSi

5 ms

0.5 ms

0.03 ms← 94% lower

ROW WINS

05 · WHICH ONE IS FOR YOU

Pick by persona

RE-RANKS LIVE AS YOU ADD OR REMOVE PRODUCTS

THE ALL-ROUNDER

Best overall

UltraGear OLED 27LG9.1

ALL GROUPSEQUAL WEIGHT

Best total score across weighted category factors.

RUNNER-UP · UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (8.8)

FOR VALUE SEEKERS

Best bang for buck

M27QGIGABYTE8.3

SCORE ÷ PRICELIVE PRICES

Strongest score-to-price ratio from the available price data.

RUNNER-UP · UltraGear OLED 27 (1.1)

PRIORITY · GAMING PERFORMANCE

Best for gaming performance

M27QGIGABYTE8.5

GAMING PERFORMANCE WEIGHTEDCONF 82%

Best visible score in the gaming performance category group.

RUNNER-UP · UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (0.0)

PRIORITY · IMAGE QUALITY

Best for image quality

M27QGIGABYTE8.0

IMAGE QUALITY WEIGHTEDCONF 77%

Best visible score in the image quality category group.

RUNNER-UP · UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (0.0)

06 · BOTTOM LINE

Why pick each

STRENGTHS · AND ONE HONEST TRADE-OFF

#2DELL0.0

UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C

“A productivity powerhouse: a sharp 32-inch 4K IPS Black panel with 140W USB-C docking and excellent color.”

Connectivity 9.5

Display 9.1

Wins Screen Size

Wins USB-C Power Delivery

TRADE-OFF120Hz, not for fast competitive gaming

WINS CONNECTIVITYBest price →

#3GIGABYTE0.0

M27Q

“A standout value 27-inch QHD 170Hz gaming monitor with an SS-IPS panel, KVM switch, and USB-C, punching well above its price.”

Value 9.5

Gaming Performance 8.5

TRADE-OFFTilt-only stand with no height or swivel adjustment

BEST VALUEBest price →

#1LG0.0

UltraGear OLED 27

“A 240Hz 1440p OLED gaming monitor with near-instant response, perfect blacks, and stunning contrast.”

Performance 9.6

Display 9.5

Wins Refresh Rate

Wins Brightness

TRADE-OFFModest full-screen brightness

BEST OVERALLBest price →

Still deciding? The UltraGear OLED 27 is the safest pick.

COMPOSITE 9.1/10 · WINS 2 OF 9 CATEGORIES

Buy the winner →

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE) vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor vs LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE): which is best?

The LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) is our overall pick, scoring 9.1/10 against 8.8/10 for the Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE) — a 3% edge. Current starting prices span $299–$899. The score weighs category-specific monitors attributes, spec wins, price signals, and data confidence — not sponsorships.

LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) leads overall with a 9.1 total score.
LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) wins 3 comparable specs with a 28% weighted win rate.
LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) has the strongest high-impact advantage in Refresh Rate.
Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor has the best visible score-to-price balance based on available starting price.

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE)8.8/10

A productivity powerhouse: a sharp 32-inch 4K IPS Black panel with 140W USB-C docking and excellent color.

Pros

+ Sharp 32-inch 4K IPS Black panel
+ Up to 140W USB-C laptop charging
+ Excellent color accuracy
+ Built-in dock with Ethernet and USB hub

Cons

− 120Hz, not for fast competitive gaming
− No OLED-level contrast
− Premium versus basic 4K monitors

Best for: Developers and office work · Color-accurate creative work · Single-cable laptop docking

“The best all-round productivity monitor: crisp 4K text, accurate color, and class-leading USB-C docking. It is a 120Hz panel, so it is not built for high-refresh competitive gaming.”

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor8.3/10

A standout value 27-inch QHD 170Hz gaming monitor with an SS-IPS panel, KVM switch, and USB-C, punching well above its price.

Pros

+ Excellent 1440p/170Hz performance for the price
+ Built-in KVM switch and USB-C with DP Alt Mode
+ Wide ~92% DCI-P3 color coverage
+ rev. 2.0 RGB panel fixes earlier text-clarity issue

Cons

− Tilt-only stand with no height or swivel adjustment
− DisplayHDR 400 is entry-level HDR at best
− USB-C delivers only 10W of power

Best for: Budget-minded 1440p gamers · Users wanting a KVM and single-cable laptop docking · First high-refresh monitor upgrades

“For shoppers who want fast 1440p gaming without spending OLED money, the M27Q remains the default value pick. The rev. 2.0 RGB panel fixes the text-clarity gripe, and the KVM plus USB-C make it more useful as a do-everything desktop monitor than most…”

LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE)WINNER 9.1/10

A 240Hz 1440p OLED gaming monitor with near-instant response, perfect blacks, and stunning contrast.

Pros

+ 240Hz with 0.03ms response
+ Perfect OLED blacks and contrast
+ Vivid, accurate color
+ Sleek low-profile design

Cons

− Modest full-screen brightness
− OLED care needed (burn-in mitigation)
− 1440p, not 4K

Best for: Competitive and fast-paced gaming · Contrast-critical media · High-refresh enthusiasts

“One of the best 1440p gaming OLEDs: blistering speed, perfect blacks, and rich color. Full-screen brightness is modest and OLED care is required, as on all OLED panels.”

Frequently asked questions

Which is best: Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE), Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor or LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE)?

By ComparZone's weighted scoring of category-specific monitors specs, the LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) scores highest overall (9.1/10, 0.3 points ahead of the Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE)). It is the better all-round pick, but the right choice depends on your priorities — the spec table above shows exactly where each one wins.

What are the main differences between these monitors?

The biggest measurable differences are Resolution, Refresh Rate, Screen Size. The grouped spec sheet above marks the winner of every comparable spec.

Can I compare other monitors on ComparZone?

Yes — ComparZone supports dynamic comparison pages for any 2 to 4 monitors from the same category, with verified specs, transparent scores, and live prices. See the related comparisons below or build your own from the category page.

More monitors comparisons

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE) vs Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming Monitor Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE) vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor Dell UltraSharp 32 4K USB-C (U3225QE) vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD)Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor vs Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming Monitor Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" 1440p 170Hz Gaming Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD)LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming Monitor LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED Monitor LG UltraGear OLED 27 (27GR95QE) vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD)All monitors →Best monitors 2026